Mrs. and Mr.Morel Relationship. - 898 Words

The Victorian novel was regarding love, its fulfilment and culmination, the modern novel, on the other hand spoke of love but the love was never realised leading to a breakdown of communication and hence a sense of alienation. In the Victorian novel, alienation was appropriated to highlight the importance of love and marriage but the modern novel merely confirmed it as a social condition. We see this pattern of the modern novel clearly followed in the Walter-Gertrude relationship as we see them fall in love, as well as witness the absence of the fulfilment of that love for either of them. The narrative of D.H. Lawrence’s â€Å"Sons and Lovers† is on one level a story of a marriage but at the same time it raises the question of whether it is†¦show more content†¦This deliberate action on Lawrence’s part ensures that the female reader doesn’t identify herself with Gertrude in a romantic association, as well as assures a bit of sympathy for Walter be ing evoked in the reader. It brings into light the fact that Gertrude in due course despises Walter for the very reasons that she fell in love with him. In the flashback episode there is moreover a mention to Gertrude’s former lover John Fields who abandoned her. This reference to John Fields can be seen as a kind of epilogue to the Morel marriage. Lawrence seems to be developing Gertrude as a character of romantic, impulsive disposition and hence proves her act of marrying Walter to be an act of sheer impulse and definitely not a wise one. The text consciously establishes her as a woman whose act leads her to unhappiness. The marriage vindicates the notion that deviations lead to unhappiness. Emerging from completely different social classes the work both Walter and Gertrude perform are completely different-Walter’s work is physical as opposed to the intellectual work of Gertrude. Hence, their dispositions to life and activities they engage in are different at every level. Their attitude towards the working class is one such aspect. The conditions and lifestyle of the mining community that Gertrude greatly despises and does her best to keep her children away from seems to satisfy Walter and he seems to have accepted them with great ease. The views they have on

Waiting for Superman Review Free Essays

Waiting for Superman Waiting for Superman is a documentary that attempts to show inequalities in what is supposed to be a fair public education system. The film is primarily centered on five families and their attempt to secure a better education for their children. The movie shows several hardships the families have to endure and somewhat ironically, the most emotional moment for me involved one young girl not being allowed to attend her elementary school graduation because her mother fell behind on payments at a private school. We will write a custom essay sample on Waiting for Superman Review or any similar topic only for you Order Now After watching Waiting for Superman I was divided in my feelings for it. After reflecting on the movie I am not sure what exactly the underlying theme of the movie is other than saying that some public school are bad and some charter schools are good. The movie never goes into the bad schools and identifies problems (other than teacher’s unions) nor does it look at the charter schools and identifies what they are doing to stand out. Waiting for Superman merely presents a few anecdotes and says there is a problem without ever revealing an underlying problem or a solution. The film loves to toss around numbers such a, â€Å"Fifty years ago the United States had the best education system in the world† without putting anything into context. My first thought when I hear statement similar to this is how do we know? We did not have standardized testing in the states. If there was some form of uniform testing whom got tested? Even though there was mandatory school attendance in the United States at this time, how strictly was it enforced and was it enforced equally among all schools—rich, poor, black, white, etc. Furthermore, fifty years ago most of the industrialized world was still trying to recover from World War II so to compare United States Education in 2009 to 1959 is unrealistic. Furthermore is the spending issue. Yes, we are spending more per student than we were before. However, with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a lot of that spending is spent on students with learning disabilities. Because much of those funds have been earmarked for specific students and programs (many ineffective) and the increased level of bureaucracy, it is also not equal to compare school funding on a student to student basis from 2009 and 1959. There were several points in the movie I did agree with. I am advocate of many of Michelle Rhee’s, Chancellor of Washington D. C. ’s public school system, decisions regarding the district. I understand many teachers and students are upset about the closing of the schools. However, Washington D. C. as suffered suburban sprawl in recent years that have left many schools only partially full costing the district millions of dollars in energy costs, personnel, and transportation costs. I also advocate for her firing many district personnel. I agree with Waiting for Superman’s analysis that many school districts have become to top heavy. Many of these employees in the district offices make the highest salaries in the district—e ven more than principals. In Polk County, FL, the district office payroll is nearly 8% of the entire district budget. This adds up to over $85M which is higher than the budgets of the largest high schools in the district! I am also bewildered how any high-performing teacher would be against the proposed salary increase that is dependent on evaluations and student success. I am confused as to how teachers (or any profession) believe they have a right to their job regardless of their performance. Despite Waiting for Superman over-simplifying and essentially demonizing teacher’s unions (and I LOATHE most unions including teacher’s unions) I agree that teacher’s should be subject to performance evaluations which might result in termination. I also agree with Waiting for Superman’s advocacy for school choice. I believe parents have the right to put their student’s in a charter school if they believe a local community school is not sufficient. Furthermore, I believe that vouchers should be extended to private schools if those schools have met the required state standards. Currently in Florida, only students who have an Individual Education Plan (IEP) could access the McKay Scholarship Program to attend private schools. This law was extended this week to all students with 504 plans to also have access to McKay scholarships. Hopefully this bill will begin to pave the way to a state approved school voucher program in Florida. It is important to point out, and I am surprised that the movie did mention this, that only 17% of charter schools have amazing results. This leads to my biggest problem with the Waiting for Superman. The film attacks public schools as being unfair and not good enough. However, not once does it visit many of the poor charter schools in the nation. Nor does it address what studies show time and time again is that a student’s background, including socio-economic status and family life, are the greatest indicator of a specific child’s success in school. This is no better exemplified in Anthony. Anthony is a young man that is being raised by his grandmother. His grandmother is raising him because his father died of a drug overdose (no mention was given of the biological mother). The grandmother admitted that when her son (Anthony’s father) was a young she did not understand the importance of education. Now she views Anthony’s education as the most important thing in both of their lives. All five of the families in Waiting for Superman place a very high importance on the education and want their children in the very best schools. This leads to a chicken versus the egg argument that the movie never attempts to answer. Are these â€Å"amazing† private and charter schools get the best results because they have the best faculty, curriculum, etc or do they receive the best results because they have kids in them whose parents put more of an emphasis on education. This is the movie I would like to see made as a follow up to Waiting for Superman. How to cite Waiting for Superman Review, Papers

Epyllion Group.Doc Uploaded Successfully free essay sample

We feel ourselves happy that we received the guidance and assistance of many helpful people on the preparation of this report. Our first thanks goes to the almighty for giving us the patience and courage to finish this huge task within its deadline. We are especially grateful to our teacher, Mr. Monzoor Morshed for his constant effort in giving valuable knowledge and enable us to produce such a professional report through practical implications of the topic covered in our class. Last but not least we would like to thank to Mrs Noorjahan Begum, the chairman and managing director of Mark Mode Limited for treating us warmly and providing us valuable information. Letter of Transmittal November 20, 2011 Monzoor Morshed Lecturer Independent University Bangladesh Dear Sir, This report has been done as a requirement to complete the course HRM 380, instructed by our course coordinator Mr. Monzoor Morshed. This report describes the Industrial relations of Epyllion group, it mainly stresses on employer and employee relation and their evaluation procedure. We will write a custom essay sample on Epyllion Group.Doc Uploaded Successfully or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page We are hoping that this report will portray the real picture of the specified company. We concentrated on taking interviews and also generated a questionnaire for collection of data to complete this report. We would be pleased to discuss this report and its conclusions with you at your request. We thank you for your cooperation and for making yourself available at times for our assistance, this report would not have been properly executed without your support. Thank You Methodology For analysis of this report we mainly considered interviewing people as most of the labors were uneducated, this procedure helped us a lot in getting the information from the laborers as well as the employees in the executive positions. We also constructed a questionnaire for the employees in the managerial positions so they can easily answer the specific questions needed for our report without consuming too much of their time busy schedule. Limitations The one and only limitation we have faced during doing this assignment was getting an internal employee of the Organization, though we are happy to accomplish this task overcoming limitation with the help of Mr. Borhan, an HR employee of Epyllion group. Major Objective Industrial relations are the relationships between employees and employers within the organizational settings. The field of industrial relations looks at the relationship between management and workers, particularly groups of workers represented by a union. Industrial relations are basically the interactions between employers, employees and the government, and the institutions and associations through which such interactions are mediated. The relationships which arise at and out of the workplace generally include the relationships between individual workers, the relationships between workers and their employer, the relationships between employers, the relationships employers and workers have with the organizations formed to promote their respective interests, and the relations between those organizations, at all levels.

Understanding Kiddushin Daf Yomi Essays - Book Of Numbers, Sivan

Understanding Kiddushin Daf Yomi Sotah 17 1) WHAT PARTS OF PARSHAS SOTAH ARE WRITTEN AND ERASED QUESTION: The Mishnah cites three opinions of Tana'im regarding which verses of the Parshah of Sotah are written down and erased in the Mayim ha'Me'orerim, as the Torah commands (Bamidbar 5:23). The Parshah of Sotah (Bamidbar 5:19-22) consists of two distinct sections. The first section is a Shevu'ah with an Alah (Alah refers to a description of the punishment that will befall her if she sinned). This section is comprised of the words Im Lo Shachav Ish (second half of verse 19) until the end of verse 20. The second section is the Shevu'ah and an Alah, wherein the Kohen details to the woman what will happen to her if she sinned. Both sections begin with Tzava'os, introductory sentences telling the Kohen to administer the Shevu'ah. At the conclusion of the Parshah, the Torah tells the woman to answer Amen, Amen to the Alos. Rebbi Yosi maintains that the Kohen writes the entire Parshah. The Gemara explains that he derives from the Heh of ha'Alos (Bamidbar 5:23) that the first half of the Parshah is to be written. This first half is referred to as the Klalos ha'Ba'os Machmas Berachos (the Klalah that is implied by the Berachah). From the word Es in the phrase Es ha'Alos (ibid.) he derives that the Kohen must write the Tzava'os and Kabalos as well (the commands to the Kohen to administer the Shevu'ah, and the command to the woman to answer Amen, Amen). It seems that Rebbi Yosi holds that the Kohen starts writing from the beginning of the Parshah of Sotah, from the beginning of verse 19 (v'Hishbi'a Osah ha'Kohen), the command to the Kohen to administer the first Shevu'ah. However, RASHI on the Mishnah (DH Lo Hayah Mafsik) tells us that even according to Rebbi Yosi, the Kohen starts writing from the words Im Lo Shachav Ish (the second half of verse 19), which is the beginning of the actual Shevu'ah. He does not start writing from the beginning of the Parshah. This is also the opinion of the RAMBAM (in Perush ha'Mishnayos). Why do they not explain that Rebbi Yosi holds that the Kohen starts from the Tzava'ah of the Shevu'ah? If, like they say, Rebbi Yosi maintains that the first Tzava'ah is not written down, then what is Rebbi Yosi's source to differentiate between the two Tzava'os? The word Es, which teaches that the Tzava'ah is to be written, is an article subordinate to the word ha'Alos which refers to both the Alah and the Shevu'ah, and therefore Es should include both Tzava'os! The Es should include both the Tzava'ah of the Alah (the second Tzava'ah), and the Tzava'ah of the Klalah (the first Tzava'ah), because the Klalah itself is alluded to by the Heh of ha'Alos! ANSWER: Rashi learns from the wording of Rebbi Yosi in the Mishnah that Rebbi Yosi does not mean to include the Tzava'ah of the Klalah. Rebbi Yosi heard Rebbi Meir say that the Kohen starts from Im Lo Shachav (the beginning of the Klalah) and then skips the Tzava'ah between the Klalah and the Alah. Rebbi Yosi argues and says the Kohen did not skip anything but wrote everything from the point at which he started. Rebbi Yosi is not arguing that the Kohen starts *earlier*. Rather, he is arguing that once the Kohen has started writing the verses (from Im Lo Shachav), he continues without skipping. He agrees with Rebbi Meir that the Tzava'ah of the Klalah is not written. He argues only about writing the Tzava'ah of the Alah. How, though, does Rebbi Yosi learn from the verse to differentiate between the two Tzava'os? The answer is that Rebbi Yosi maintains that the Es is coming to add something to what is written *openly* in the verse -- the Alos, but not to something that is only hinted to in the verse, which is the Klalah (hinted to by the letter Heh of ha'Alos). 2) QUESTION: The Gemara asks why Rebbi Meir insists that the verse Im Lo Shachav is to be written and erased. Rebbi Meir holds that we cannot infer the inverse from a statement, and thus there is no point in writing the verse, If no man has lain with you and you have not committed adultery..., because it is not part of the Klalah that says that she will die if she sinned. What is the Gemara's question? Rebbi Meir says that the Heh of ha'Alos teaches that we write the Klalos ha'Ba'os Machmas Berachos. Even